School of Pharmacy Publications Team Members |
STRANGE
Lab for GPcR
Research |
|
|
|
Current Projects
|
|
|
(i)The basis and importance
of GPCR dimerisation/oligomerisation This is a phenomenon
for GPCR's that is beginning to be accepted30
but the functional importance of dimer formation is not yet well defined. For
the D2 dopamine receptor we have shown using biochemical
techniques such as immunoprecipitation of two epitope tagged forms of the
receptor and using Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) that the
receptor is a constitutive dimer/oligomer33. The
importance of this oligomer formation for the function of the receptor has
been studied using ligand binding.
For the receptor expressed in either CHO cells or in Sf 9
insect cells we have shown that the maximal binding (Bmax) for
different radioligands is different and may be manipulated by changing the
concentration of sodium ions in the assay buffer 24,48. These data are not consistent with a
monomeric receptor and may be interpreted in terms of binding to an
oligomeric receptor with negatively cooperative interactions between
successive molecules of ligand for binding to the receptor. It seems that drugs can interact at
the D2 receptor in two ways, either by competitive inhibition or
by allosteric/non-competitive interaction across a dimeric/oligomeric
receptor. Previous work in the lab had shown that the D2 receptor
was subject to allosteric regulation by amiloride analogues 4,19
so this may all be part of a general picture that is emerging whereby drugs
can act on GPCR's either at the primary ligand binding site or via allosteric
interactions. If, as seems be apparent, GPCRs are oligomers it is important now to examine whether this has further functional consequences. |
(ii)
Understanding receptor/G protein signalling in relation to the
mechanism of agonists and inverse agonists. Here we are
taking several approaches. CHO cells expressing D2 dopamine and
5HT1A serotonin receptors are being examined. Assays have been
developed for the activation of G proteins using the binding of [35S]GTPgS and the system is being
manipulated in various ways and effects on agonist signalling determined 1,6,9,31.
We are using
these systems to ask questions about how agonists and inverse agonists signal
through G protein coupled receptors in order to understand the mechanisms of
ligand efficacy. For example, we
have performed several investigations in to the mechanisms of agonist action 6,9,29.
For some groups of compounds the
stabilisation of the ternary complex of agonist/receptor/G protein can
account for agonist efficacy whereas for other this is not the case and the
system seems more complex. One
possibility is that for full and partial agonists the rate determining step
in the G protein cycle is different and we have some evidence to support this
idea 38. In order to examine this further we
are developing assays for each of the steps in the G protein cycle so that
effects of full and partial agonists may be examined54. We are also using
the insect cell/baculovirus system in order to express specified combinations
of D2 receptor and different G proteins in order to examine R/G
specificity and the effects of changing the R/G ratio. Using this system we
have shown that agonists signal more effectively through a D2/Go
combination as compared to a D2/Gi2 combination 25. This work has been extended to
examine interactions between D2 and Gi1, Gi2,
Gi3 and Go 32,34. It seems that each R/G combination
has its own pharmacological signature. Much of this work
is backed up by simulations using models for R/G interaction and a number of
theoretical papers have been published on this topic and models generated. |
|
(iii) The mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs. We
published the first report that these drugs are inverse agonists at D2
dopamine receptors and we are examining the importance of this inverse agonism
for the actions of these drugs 5.
We also showed that inverse agonism was a property of both the typical and
the atypical antipsychotic drugs 44. Additionally, we have been able to
show inverse agonist effects at the level of inhibition of [35S]GTPgS binding and this work has
shown that some of the drugs achieve their inverse agonist effects by
converting the receptor to an inactive state unable to signal, whereas others
prevent formation of the ternary complex 46. We
have also studied a range of partial agonist drugs such as aripiprazole, a
new antipsychotic that conflicts with the accepted paradigm that
antispsychotics must be antagonists or inverse agonists at D2 receptors. Using the [35S]GTPgS binding assay we have
shown that this drug is indeed a partial agonist and we have developed
conditions for increasing the signals for such partial agonists in this assay50.
This has allowed us to profile a range of drugs at this receptor for
their activity and develop an efficacy scale50, 56. |
(iv) The actions of chemokines on the chemokine receptor CCR5. This receptor is of
importance because as well as being an important target for chemokine action
it is a co-receptor for the entry of HIV in to lymphocytes. We are examining
a number of events that follow CCR5 activation (G protein activation, calcium
release, inhibition of cAMP
production, receptor phosphorylation, receptor internalisation,
receptor dimerisation) and the ability of a range of natural chemokines to
trigger these different events.
The panel of chemokines used exhibit different abilities to affect the
different signalling events 27, 49, 53. We
have also examined the mechanisms of internalisation of CCR5 in cells and
have provided evidence that CCR5 enters cells through coated pit and caveloae
mechanisms 26. This work has been extended to
examine the intracellular pathways involved in receptor internalisation and
recycling and it appears that actin microfilaments and Rho proteins may be
involved 40. A series of drugs
directed at CCR5 has been examined and shown to be inverse agonists against
constitutive activity from the native receptor. These drugs are also allosteric antagonists of chemokine
activation of CCR552. |
|
Much
of our work is backed up by simulations of data. Recently, however, a study has been published that
addresses issues about the definition of agonist affinity and agonist
efficacy57. It seems that for many GPCRs, providing G protein coupling
is suppressed, good estimates of agonist affinity may be obtained using
ligand binding and functional assays.
New methods for assessing agonist efficacy are also proposed. |
|
|
School of Pharmacy | Current Research | Publications | Team
Members | E-mail
| Social
Events |
Contact p.g.strange@rdg.ac.uk for queries
relating to the site.
Last updated Feb. 2008